In order for us to put my dehydra package on the next Fedora Release we need to make sure it passes the Fedora Review Guidelines.
So I went through my SPEC file to see what needs to be fixed or corrected so it can pass the Fedora Review Phase. So far I went through the checklist and I think everything is OK. I did the rpmlint test on all the RPM files, and they all passed with no errors only a couple warnings.
** if any of you have the time, can you please also check my package if it would pass the review board and just make a comment, thanks BoChao :)
[bchao@HongKong SPECS]$ rpmlint dehydra.spec
dehydra.spec:7: W: non-standard-group Applications/Programming
dehydra.spec:32: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Since its 4am in the morning, I don't think Chris Tyler would be awake so I jumped on IRC and joined the #fedora-devel channel on the freenode server.
**You can connect to the irc via web: Link
Here is a snippet of our conversation: IRC Chat
After that conversation, I went back to my spec file and added the comments he suggested.
And Now We have dehydra-0.9-3
Sadly this is not ready to be release to public till I get my other project up and running which is backporting GCC4.5 to 4.4
Here is my updated dehydra spec file
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Many in this crowd are likely to live a sort of go-with-the-flow lifestyle, and I’m tempted to say that they’re also likely to make their purchases and other decisions without much thought about what it is that they’re doing
fake bags
Though it’s likely to be observed upon taking any sort of population sample that people fall to the extremes, those who stringently avoid everything they can consider as being an imitation and those who really don’t give a shit either way replica rolex watches
Post a Comment